|
||||||
|
|
Tender Years Doctrine In custody litigation, mothers and fathers have an equal opportunity to obtain the custody of their children. The tender years doctrine, whereby mothers were the preferred custodians of very young children, no longer exists. In re Marriage of Kennedy, 94 Ill.App.3d 537, 545, 418 N.E.2d 947, 953, 49 Ill.Dec. 927, 933 (1st Dist. 1981), it was stated: Changing social and legal trends have cast the tender years doctrine aside. The doctrine rested on a sociological presumption that maternal affection is more active and better adapted to the care of the child than that of the father. With the advent of new lifestyles for both men and women, however, the factual basis for the doctrine, if there ever was one, has vanished… The sex of the candidate for custody is but one of the many factors that may be considered in determining which parent receives the child. Although mothers are no longer favored under the tender years presumption, courts may give added weight to the parent who served as the child’s primary care giver. In practice, this often means a slight preference toward the mother. In re Marriage of Dall, 191 Ill.App.3d 652, 548 N.E.2d 109, 138 Ill.Dec. 879 (5th Dist. 1989). Other cases of interest include: Jines v. Jines, 63 Ill.App.3d 564, 380 N.E.2d 440, 443, 20 Ill.Dec. 462 (5th Dist. 1978). In re Marriage of Ramer, 84 Ill.App.3d 213, 405 N.E.2d 401, 404, 39 Ill.Dec. 648 (5th Dist. 1980). Marcus v. Marcus, 24 Ill.App.3d 401, 320 N.E.2d 581 (1974).
|
|||||
D. Siegel, Esq.
This website contains legal information, and not legal advice. |
||||||